Bennett Relation
\[\frac{\mu_0 I^2}{8\pi} = N k_B(T_e + T_i)\]
Variables
| Symbol | Meaning | Units |
|---|---|---|
| \(I\) | total axial current | A |
| \(N\) | ions per unit length (line density) | m⁻¹ |
| \(T_e,\,T_i\) | electron and ion temperatures | K |
| \(\mu_0\) | permeability of free space | H/m |
Assumptions
- Static, cylindrically symmetric Z-pinch equilibrium
- Radial force balance \(dp/dr = -J_zB_\theta\) with \(B_\theta = \mu_0I(r)/2\pi r\)
- Quasi-neutral, single ion species, isotropic pressure \(p = n k_B(T_e+T_i)\)
- No axial field \(B_z\)
Derivation sketch
Multiply the force balance by \(r^2\) and integrate from 0 to \(a\). Integrating the pressure term by parts converts \(\int r^2(dp/dr)\,dr\) into \(-2\int rp\,dr\), i.e. the total pressure over the cross-section; the magnetic term likewise reduces to the total current. All profile information cancels, leaving a relation between integrated quantities only.
Notes
The profile-independence is the striking feature: whatever the density and temperature shapes, a given current confines a given line density at a given temperature. The relation is exact for the stated assumptions — and says nothing about stability, which is what actually killed the Z-pinch. See kink instability.
Related
- Pinch equilibria — derivation and context
- Magnetic stress tensor · Virial theorem
- Z-pinch design example — worked with real numbers